TS | On Aesthetics, Theology and Art

Thesis:

The ability to emit Aesthetical Judgements understood as Communion with God and learnable through Art.

Aesthetical Judgements allow the perciever to discriminate elements within Reality on a level other than mere abstraction.

Aesthetics have traditionally been reduced to taste. Understood, through taste.

I say everything is touch.

On an outmost elemental Physical Sphere, everything is touch.

Which is another Aesthetical Judgement.

I dare to state this ability is born within communion with God. A relationship.

If this intimidates you too much, just think of what Plato, who believed in intuition as a way to access Knowledge, would have called Beauty, oder Good.

Now only one aspect is open.

Open wide, in fact; How do you teach this?

Through speech, through acts, through expressing our souls, the true Beauty within the heart of each of us…

Which I define, as Art.

TS: On Forgiveness

As we are conducting a Syncretism… We must consider everything said to this date.

And everything will mean every, thing.

Jesus of Nazareth reportedly proposed we humans (“brothers”), should and must forgive everything to everyone with no, excepions.

I straight up defend this goes against the very nature of the human soul.

Let’s consider “Harry Potter”.* I am dead serious. In said books, there were mentioned some ‘unforgivable curses’ (let’s undetstand actions), which would include:

Assassination.
Torture.
Deprivement of Free Will.

[*Sidenote: Magick does exist. And it is nothing but unshared technology… Can be found at Area51 and at certain regional shops].

Well, I would very much say Joanne was very right at heart.

Whereas magic wands do be ficcional, said actions aren’t:

You can murder another human being, torture them or… Well…

Yup, there we’d be.

Get in the shoes of the human being in the illustration. Would you forgive?

This is the conclusion:

Forgiveness can improve the world and heal the victim, but God, doesn’t obligue you. Id est, you are in your right to not forgive, to take (legal) actions, etc…
Source: The Grim Adventures of Billy And Mandy 01×06.

Thanks for reading.

On Determinism vs. Freedom of Choice

Back one year, namely 2015, I wrote, on my very own, this extremely experimental collection in which I introduced Microessay, which I defend to be a whole writing genre.

Said book is called “Contado en una página (Told on one Page)”, and one of its 80-1 microessays goes as follows:

“Determinism, is compatible with freedom of choice, as long as you can accept choices you make are made beforehand.”

Obviosly, things evolve. People, evolve. And I ain’t no exception.

Now I firmly assert Freedom of Choice.

A Freedom of Choice of a divine nature. One of God’s almightiness limits*.

How do I prove it? I just don’t feel like it. 🙃

*Others would be:

Mathemathical or Logical limits. E.g., making a sphere of 1 side.
Freedom of Choice, as said, because…
It happens that God “cannot” do something he doesn’t want to. And it is His rules.
Cease to exist (…)

Theist Cosmovision of History

Disclaimer: The way I draw may pierce your eyes if you exaggerate enough.

Explanation of the drawing:

The Red represents God and the black, men.

The book is Red because God is both omniscious and creator.

The book is open on a certain period of Macrohistory (what people often refer to as “History”) and “Microhistory” or “Personal History”.

In this Cosmovision, Personal History constitutes Macrohistory and, as a whole, History itself.

We write History. History isn’t being written by an “author”.

We do. We invented the wheel, the revolver, and the Smartphone.

Moreover, the red “coma” on the book, represents God’s intercesion in History, as for the Theistic belief.