On The Nature of God (duality)

Hieroglyph for Ra.

Ra, the main of the Ancient Egyptian deities, was “described” as:

He who is and is not.

–There should be a source out there.

Whereas this very could be straight up gimmick, I do believe God indeed has a dual Nature.

Which would be:

1. Ontological

As what Parmenides called Being, or that which Plato called Good, later Aristotle, Existence.

2. Personal

As creator of the Universe (similar to what Plato referred to as Demiurge), and,

A personal Supreme Entity, Unique and of Divine Nature, which actively intercedes in human History and each of our personal histories.

TS: On the Nature of Love… And of Hatred

The ace of Spades is a common depiction of Hatred.

First off, we are going to recapitulate what Ancient Greeks understood as Love.

1. Eros.

Love born from sexual desire.

2. Agape.

The desire that the loved one will be okay. A kind of a “humanistic love.”

3. Philia

As in a strong relationship, such as true friendship. Charmful and affectionate.

4. Storge

As in intrafamiliar relationship.

So, what is hatred?

I. Envy.

Hatred, as insane as may seem, very could be born out of love. A frustrated, kind of love.

Or straight up perverted, but love at nature.

I define hatred as: Strong feeling of aversion towards something you dislike and which bad you desire.

If you envy someone, you will certainly do anything to hurt them. Speaking about unhealthy envy.

You can see someone doing better than you in any aspect and understand it as a call to improve yourself, and that, far from being wrong, is how it should work.

But, if you have this perverted sense of love that I am talking about on someone, you can… And eventually, will, hurt them.

Sexually. Some people just don’t get “not there, means not there” and will use sexual violence.

Envy. A perversion of love in interpersonal relationships by which, far from promoting the good of the other part, you try your hardest to destroy it…

…Oftentimes groupally.

Family therapy needed. When everybody loves everybody so bad but somehow some, most or all of the family members act terrible.

From The Simpsons TV Series.

On the nature of Evil [Practical Philosophy]

Exempli gratia

1. I define Good as that which Plato identified with Beauty, thus leading to my previous Thesis on

Aesthetics and Aesthetical Judgements

1. ~ I won’t go any further.

2. I do not define Evil. For HELL’s sake, I don’t give a hoot on wether your father used to beat you or you straight up lack of empathy: Just “Do NOT be that much of a bastard”.

Thanks for reading.

TS: On Onlotology

Ontology: Primary branch of Philosophy which attempts to study and understand the nature of Being and Existence.

Saturn

The Thesis identifies with the argumentation:

Parmenides first stated: Being is, and, no-being, is, not.

Plato described a supranatural metaphysical world of Ideas. Objects are shadows of Reality, which are Ideas, and of which the highest expression is the Idea of Good, Beauty, Being or One. It is the same.

Saint Agustín identified the world with the “Mind of God”.

Nowadays Physics state the Universe is “The biggest conceivable physical system.”

But then again, what is its Nature.

The Universe is Existence. Existence is the Being. And Being is God.

Metaphysics barely “unique” inquery is “What is Being”.

I, state Being is God, as the Existence of the Universe, of Totality.

Which is a definition for Reality.

As a not-that-much-of-a-side note, this could easily lead into a pantheistic cosmovision.

Mine. Mine. Which is mine and doesn’t need to be yours, is that God is One and of a Personal Nature, and also intercedes actively in History, both microhistory and Macrohistory.

TS | On Aesthetics, Theology and Art

By Wassily Kandinsky

Thesis:

The ability to emit Aesthetical Judgements understood as Communion with God and learnable through Art.

Aesthetical Judgements allow the perciever to discriminate elements within Reality on a level other than mere abstraction.

Aesthetics have traditionally been reduced to taste. Understood, through taste.

I say everything is touch.

On an outmost elemental Physical Sphere, everything is touch.

Which is another Aesthetical Judgement.

I dare to state this ability is born within communion with God. A relationship.

If this intimidates you too much, just think of what Plato, who believed in intuition as a way to access Knowledge, would have called Beauty, oder Good.

Now only one aspect is open.

Open wide, in fact; How do you teach this?

Through speech, through acts, through expressing our souls, the true Beauty within the heart of each of us…

Which I define, as Art.

TS: On Forgiveness

From Wikipedia

As we are conducting a Syncretism… We must consider everything said to this date.

And everything will mean every, thing.

Jesus of Nazareth reportedly proposed we humans (“brothers”), should and must forgive everything to everyone with no, excepions.

I straight up defend this goes against the very nature of the human soul.

Let’s consider “Harry Potter”.* I am dead serious. In said books, there were mentioned some ‘unforgivable curses’ (let’s undetstand actions), which would include:

  • Assassination.
  • Torture.
  • Deprivement of Free Will.

[*Sidenote: Magick does exist. And it is nothing but unshared technology… Can be found at Area51 and at certain regional shops].

Well, I would very much say Joanne was very right at heart.

Whereas magic wands do be ficcional, said actions aren’t:

You can murder another human being, torture them or… Well…

Yup, there we’d be.

Get in the shoes of the human being in the illustration. Would you forgive?

This is the conclusion:

Forgiveness can improve the world and heal the victim, but God, doesn’t obligue you. Id est, you are in your right to not forgive, to take (legal) actions, etc…

Source: The Grim Adventures of Billy And Mandy 01×06.

Thanks for reading.

Theism as the Great Syncretism: On Haitian Vodoun.

First 29 minutes.

Haitian Vodoun is itself a Syncretism. It merges elements from African Ancient Religious beliefs and some of Christianism and others…

As we can see in the video, the image shows a Cross and a Key.

The rest is pure parafernalia.

Vodoun includes a series of beliefs, of which have a special place:

1. Belief in a Supreme Deity. Which they would call Bondye (from Haiti Crole “Good God”. It is inaccesible.

2. Iwas. Sort of intermediates between us humans and Bondye. A Vudoist is meant to devote their life to one Iwa exclusively.

3. There are guides. Some of them lead us into well-hearted actions; whereas others lead us into Evil.

4. There is no counterpat to the Supreme Goof Entity. What other religions would call a Satán (from Hebrew, Enemy).

Now, let’s make a greater Syncretism.

In THEISTIC SYNCRETISM, we believe:

1. There is a God. One.

2. God has no counterpart, devil*, demon or Satán. Us humans are responsible for each of our actions.

3. Said responsibility is Judged through a “Balance”. Divine Justice may be Eerthen or after our Death.

3.1. God also takes into consideration, not only our actions, but as well the experiences or circumstances which led us into them.

4. God participates actively in human History, in a way or another.

5. Therefor, Vodoun is a way to and consists in a Prayer (id est, talking to God), for the Balance to take place Earthenly.

* A “devil” is nothing but an extremely intelligent human being.

6. Source: Turns out God does be accesible… Surprise…