Tag: philosophy

On The Nature of God (duality)

Hieroglyph for Ra.

Ra, the main of the Ancient Egyptian deities, was “described” as:

He who is and is not.

–There should be a source out there.

Whereas this very could be straight up gimmick, I do believe God indeed has a dual Nature.

Which would be:

1. Ontological

As what Parmenides called Being, or that which Plato called Good, later Aristotle, Existence.

2. Personal

As creator of the Universe (similar to what Plato referred to as Demiurge), and,

A personal Supreme Entity, Unique and of Divine Nature, which actively intercedes in human History and each of our personal histories.

TS: On the Nature of Love… And of Hatred

The ace of Spades is a common depiction of Hatred.

First off, we are going to recapitulate what Ancient Greeks understood as Love.

1. Eros.

Love born from sexual desire.

2. Agape.

The desire that the loved one will be okay. A kind of a “humanistic love.”

3. Philia

As in a strong relationship, such as true friendship. Charmful and affectionate.

4. Storge

As in intrafamiliar relationship.

So, what is hatred?

I. Envy.

Hatred, as insane as may seem, very could be born out of love. A frustrated, kind of love.

Or straight up perverted, but love at nature.

I define hatred as: Strong feeling of aversion towards something you dislike and which bad you desire.

If you envy someone, you will certainly do anything to hurt them. Speaking about unhealthy envy.

You can see someone doing better than you in any aspect and understand it as a call to improve yourself, and that, far from being wrong, is how it should work.

But, if you have this perverted sense of love that I am talking about on someone, you can… And eventually, will, hurt them.

Sexually. Some people just don’t get “not there, means not there” and will use sexual violence.

Envy. A perversion of love in interpersonal relationships by which, far from promoting the good of the other part, you try your hardest to destroy it…

…Oftentimes groupally.

Family therapy needed. When everybody loves everybody so bad but somehow some, most or all of the family members act terrible.

From The Simpsons TV Series.

On the nature of Evil [Practical Philosophy]

Exempli gratia

1. I define Good as that which Plato identified with Beauty, thus leading to my previous Thesis on

TS | On Aesthetics, Theology and Art
Aesthetics and Aesthetical Judgements

1. ~ I won’t go any further.

2. I do not define Evil. For HELL’s sake, I don’t give a hoot on wether your father used to beat you or you straight up lack of empathy: Just “Do NOT be that much of a bastard”.

Thanks for reading.

TS: On Forgiveness

From Wikipedia

As we are conducting a Syncretism… We must consider everything said to this date.

And everything will mean every, thing.

Jesus of Nazareth reportedly proposed we humans (“brothers”), should and must forgive everything to everyone with no, excepions.

I straight up defend this goes against the very nature of the human soul.

Let’s consider “Harry Potter”.* I am dead serious. In said books, there were mentioned some ‘unforgivable curses’ (let’s undetstand actions), which would include:

  • Assassination.
  • Torture.
  • Deprivement of Free Will.

[*Sidenote: Magick does exist. And it is nothing but unshared technology… Can be found at Area51 and at certain regional shops].

Well, I would very much say Joanne was very right at heart.

Whereas magic wands do be ficcional, said actions aren’t:

You can murder another human being, torture them or… Well…

Yup, there we’d be.

Get in the shoes of the human being in the illustration. Would you forgive?

This is the conclusion:

Forgiveness can improve the world and heal the victim, but God, doesn’t obligue you. Id est, you are in your right to not forgive, to take (legal) actions, etc…

Source: The Grim Adventures of Billy And Mandy 01×06.

Thanks for reading.

Playing My own “Black” Card

Monopoly Cards.

I was going to make a hell of an argumentative text on this so-called Pandemic.

Referring to contradictions on mass media, Occam’s razor, or even the fact that everything that has been said, from virus and variants names to designed images shown, are Aesthetically identical to the means Mercadotechnia uses.

I don’t have the technical maestry to word it, alas.

Although I very can say:

“Listerine prevents cavities and stains”, while the ad shows images of two things people tend to fear for two reasons, namely illness and social outcasting.

And, “Delta variant is even deadlier and spreads much faster”. And no, I am not taking this any further.

I am not even going to mention a Social Retroengeenering model of fear, mass control, and plain global terrorism or massive fundamental rights vulneration, if thee consider.

As for vaccines. Of course, of course Sars-cov-2 was a thing. Of course it was. It exploded, many people died and then fucking fade out.

Getting vaccinned against Covid19 has the same impact (or risks, everything be told) as vaccinating yourself against leprosy would have.

Now let’s see how long this site stand up for.

–Prior.

On Determinism vs. Freedom of Choice

👉🏻👆🏻👈🏻👇🏻👆🏻👆🏻🤘🏻

Back one year, namely 2015, I wrote, on my very own, this extremely experimental collection in which I introduced Microessay, which I defend to be a whole writing genre.

Said book is called “Contado en una página (Told on one Page)”, and one of its 80-1 microessays goes as follows:

“Determinism, is compatible with freedom of choice, as long as you can accept choices you make are made beforehand.”

Obviosly, things evolve. People, evolve. And I ain’t no exception.

Now I firmly assert Freedom of Choice.

A Freedom of Choice of a divine nature. One of God’s almightiness limits*.

How do I prove it? I just don’t feel like it. 🙃

*Others would be:

  • Mathemathical or Logical limits. E.g., making a sphere of 1 side.
  • Freedom of Choice, as said, because…
  • It happens that God “cannot” do something he doesn’t want to. And it is His rules.
  • Cease to exist (…)